刘祥庆, 刘晶波. 基于纤维模型的拱形断面地铁车站结构弹塑性地震反应时程分析[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(10): 150-157.
引用本文: 刘祥庆, 刘晶波. 基于纤维模型的拱形断面地铁车站结构弹塑性地震反应时程分析[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(10): 150-157.
LIU Xiang-qing, LIU Jing-bo. TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS OF ELASTO-PLASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A SUBWAY STATION STRUCTURE WITH ARCHED CROSS SECTION BASED ON FIBER MODEL[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(10): 150-157.
Citation: LIU Xiang-qing, LIU Jing-bo. TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS OF ELASTO-PLASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A SUBWAY STATION STRUCTURE WITH ARCHED CROSS SECTION BASED ON FIBER MODEL[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(10): 150-157.

基于纤维模型的拱形断面地铁车站结构弹塑性地震反应时程分析

TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS OF ELASTO-PLASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A SUBWAY STATION STRUCTURE WITH ARCHED CROSS SECTION BASED ON FIBER MODEL

  • 摘要: 采用基于粘弹性静-动力统一人工边界的静-动力联合分析方法,并采用钢筋混凝土纤维模型程序THUFIBER模拟地铁车站结构,使用大型通用有限元软件MSC.Marc对北京市一座拱形断面结构型式的单层三跨岛式站台车站进行了水平向弹塑性地震反应时程分析。计算结果表明:结构边跨拱形顶板的中段、柱上端是水平方向加速度与位移反应强烈部位;柱是结构抗震受力最不利部位,且柱上端与下端所受轴力相差不大,但柱上端所受到的弯矩更大,这使得在强地震作用下,柱上端有可能在较大弯矩作用下先于柱下端破坏;拱形断面结构型式可以有效的减小作用在拱形顶板上的弯矩,而代之以承受相对较大的轴力,因此相对于矩形断面结构型式,拱形断面的受力要更合理和更有利。此外,数值分析结果还表明:相对于目前广泛采用的设计基本地震加速度,对地铁车站等地下结构进行抗震分析及设计时采用自由场地面与基岩间的峰值相对位移(PGRD)作为设计地震动参数更为合理和有效。

     

    Abstract: Time history analysis of elasto-plastic seismic response of a single-layer three-span subway station with arched cross section and island platform has been carried out using finite element software MSC.Marc by means of static-dynamic coupling analysis method based on unified viscous-spring artificial boundary. A fiber model program THUFIBER is used to simulate the structure. The results show that both the middle positions of arched roofs of side spans and top positions of columns have strong responses to the horizontal acceleration and displacement. The columns take greater internal forces than other members of the structure under horizontal seismic loads, which implies that the columns are the most disadvantageous positions of seismic bearing. Compared with the bottom of the column, the top of it takes a similar axial force but a greater moment, thus it may be crushed first under strong seismic loads. The arched shape top roof takes a smaller moment and a relatively greater axial force, so the structural form with arched cross section has a more reasonable and advantageous stress state than that with rectangular cross section. The results also show that for the aseismic analysis and design of underground structures, the peak ground displacement relative to bedrock (PGRD) seems to be a more reasonable and efficient design parameter of ground motion than the design basic acceleration of ground motion.

     

/

返回文章
返回