张海程, 杜树碧, 李明水, 杨阳. 紊流积分尺度对CAARC模型迎风面极值风压特性的影响及修正方法[J]. 工程力学, 2023, 40(10): 11-20. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0092
引用本文: 张海程, 杜树碧, 李明水, 杨阳. 紊流积分尺度对CAARC模型迎风面极值风压特性的影响及修正方法[J]. 工程力学, 2023, 40(10): 11-20. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0092
ZHANG Hai-cheng, DU Shu-bi, LI Ming-shui, YANG Yang. THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(10): 11-20. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0092
Citation: ZHANG Hai-cheng, DU Shu-bi, LI Ming-shui, YANG Yang. THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(10): 11-20. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0092

紊流积分尺度对CAARC模型迎风面极值风压特性的影响及修正方法

THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD

  • 摘要: 大气边界层流场中紊流度剖面可以正确模拟,但紊流积分尺度很难精确模拟,对于CAARC (commonwealth advisory aeronautical research council)标准高层建筑模型在大气边界层B类场地,实际紊流积分尺度为高层建筑采用常用缩尺比在常规风洞中的1.4倍~2.7倍。该文通过风洞试验在大气边界层B类场地中采用5种不同缩尺比工况,其中一种工况接近于工程实际,通过其余四种工况与这种工况对比,定量地研究了紊流积分尺度对CAARC模型迎风面极值风压特性的影响。结果表明,极值风压系数随紊流积分尺度的增大而增大,极值风压系数误差随模拟紊流积分尺度误差的增大而增大,当实际紊流积分尺度为模拟积分尺度的3.25倍时,实际极值风压系数为模拟极值风压系数的1.55倍,误差率高达35%,且迎风面越靠近驻点的测点,受紊流积分尺度的这种影响越显著;为了更深入理解紊流积分尺度的影响,利用脉动风压功率谱分析了极值风压受紊流积分尺度的影响机理;最后根据紊流积分尺度对极值风压系数的影响,提出了迎风面极值风压系数的修正公式。该试验采用的紊流积分尺度涵盖高层建筑常用缩尺比在常规风洞中紊流积分尺度模拟的所有误差范围,同时以CAARC标准高层建筑模型为试验对象,可以为所有风洞试验结果提供修正依据,同时可以推广到其他钝体。

     

    Abstract: The turbulence profile in the atmospheric boundary can be correctly simulated, but the turbulence integration scale is difficult to accurately simulate. For the CAARC (commonwealth advisory aeronautical research council) standard high-rise building model, the actual turbulence integration scale is 1.4 to 2.7 times that of the common integral scale used in high-rise buildings in conventional wind tunnels. In this paper, five different turbulent integration scales of atmospheric boundary layer wind fields of Category B were considered. One of them was close to the actual flow field, and the effect of the turbulent integration scale on the extreme wind pressure characteristics on the windward of the CAARC model was quantitatively studied by comparing the remaining four flow fields with this flow field. The results show that the extreme wind pressure coefficient increases with the increase of the turbulence integral scale, and the error of the extreme wind pressure coefficient increases with the increase of the error of the simulated turbulence integral scale. When the actual turbulence integral scale is 3.25 times the simulated integral scale, the actual extreme wind pressure coefficient is 1.55 times the extreme wind pressure coefficient in simulated integral scale, and the error rate is as high as 35%. And the closer the stagnation point, the more significant the effect of the turbulence integral scale. To better understand the effect of the turbulence integral scale, the mechanism of the effect of the turbulence integration scale on the extreme wind pressure was analysed through the power spectrum of the fluctuating pressure. Finally, the correction formula of extreme wind pressure coefficient on windward was proposed according to the effect of turbulent integral scale on the extreme wind pressure coefficient. The turbulence integral scale used in this test covers all the error ranges simulated by the turbulence integral scale commonly used in high-rise buildings in conventional wind tunnels, and the standard high-rise building model can provide a correction basis for all wind tunnel experimental results and can be generalized to other blunt bodies.

     

/

返回文章
返回