复杂波场对高重力坝极限抗震承载能力的影响

INFLUENCE OF COMPLEX WAVEFIELD ON ULTIMATE ASEISMIC CAPACITY OF HIGH GRAVITY DAM

  • 摘要: 针对高重力坝极限抗震承载能力研究尚未考虑复杂波场影响的问题,以我国西南地区典型重力坝工程为例开展研究。引入随机波场方法生成符合场址特征的波场和运动场,采用混凝土损伤塑性模型模拟材料的非线性特征,设计垂直入射和复杂波场两类输入方案,研究不同地震动峰值对应波场作用下重力坝的破坏过程。结果显示,垂直入射方案和复杂波场方案得到的重力坝宏观破坏区基本一致,控制性破坏模式均为下游坝面中上部至上游坝面的贯通破坏。复杂波场方案的坝体累积塑性耗散能约为垂直入射方案的2倍,宏观破坏区范围也更大。两种计算方案坝体宏观破坏区贯通时重力坝均未出现滑动失稳。综合坝体累积塑性耗散能、宏观破坏区贯通和抗滑稳定性,可认为三组波场条件下垂直入射方案高重力坝的极限抗震承载能力分别为0.84g、0.95g和0.80g,复杂波场方案对应的极限抗震承载能力分别为0.75g、0.80g和0.74g。复杂波场显著降低了高重力坝的极限抗震承载能力,三组波场的最大降幅是0.15g

     

    Abstract: The impact of complex wavefields on the ultimate aseismic capacity of high gravity dams remains an area requiring a comprehensive investigation. This study addresses this gap by performing a nonlinear dynamic analysis of a typical high-gravity dam in southeastern China. In the investigation, the random wavefield method was introduced to generate the site-specific wavefield and motion field fit for the seismic response of gravity dams. The Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model was employed to capture the nonlinear behavior of concrete. Two input schemes, the vertical incidence and the complex wavefield, were designed to calculate the dam's failure process under the action of wave fields corresponding to different Ground Acceleration Peaks (GAP). The results indicate that the spatial distribution of failure areas is similar under both schemes. And the failure patterns of the gravity dam under two input schemes are both from the upper part of the downstream face to the upstream face. The extent of failure is significantly greater for the complex wavefield scheme, since the cumulative plastic dissipation energy under this scheme is approximately double that of the vertical incidence one. The sliding stability safety factor remains high across all cases, even after the cut-through of failure areas. Considering the cumulative plastic dissipation energy, the development of failure areas, and the sliding stability safety factors, the ultimate seismic capacity of this gravity dam under the vertical incidence scheme is 0.84g, 0.95g, and 0.80g, respectively, for three wavefield conditions. In comparison, the corresponding values under the complex wavefield scheme are 0.75g, 0.80g, and 0.74g. The complex wavefield significantly reduces the ultimate aseismic capacity of the high-gravity dam, with a maximum reduction of 0.15g observed among the three wavefield conditions investigated.

     

/

返回文章
返回